Place your marker
Start with your own view of where you are now. The point is to explain your thinking clearly, not to guess what your appraiser wants to hear.
Move between role journeys, reference tools, and source materials without losing your place.
Appraisee Journey
This route helps you prepare for the conversation, place your marker with confidence, and leave with a clearer path forward.
This route is built around one clear arc: your view, the shared discussion, then the agreed next move.
Start with your own view of where you are now. The point is to explain your thinking clearly, not to guess what your appraiser wants to hear.
Your appraiser adds their view next. Use the difference between the two markers to explore evidence, expectations, and context calmly.
Finish by agreeing where you are heading, what support matters, and what needs to happen between now and the next review.
A little preparation makes the meeting calmer, fairer, and more useful.
The map is a shared thinking tool. It gives you a way to discuss what you are doing, how you are doing it, and where the conversation is meant to move next.
Shared Appraisal Map
The first marker is your own current view. The second is your appraiser's view. The third is the shared destination you agree together. The useful part of the meeting sits in the gap between those three positions.
The guidance pack uses example comments to help people interpret the map, but they are only prompts. The aim is not to find a perfect sentence or a perfect dot. The aim is to make your judgement visible and explainable.
Place your marker against the expectations of your current role and level, not against someone else's remit or a future promotion standard.
Strong outputs do not automatically mean strong behaviours, and good intent does not automatically mean strong performance. Read each axis on its own.
The deck uses example phrases to help interpret different parts of the map. They are there to support judgement, not to give you words you must match or repeat.
Every organisation sits somewhere on a continuum from more objective to more interpretive judgement. The point is fair, explainable placement, not pretending the map is mathematically exact.
Some organisations judge performance in absolute terms, while others allow for context such as complexity, disruption, or challenge. Know which approach your trust has chosen.
A placement becomes more useful when you can point to examples, patterns, and moments that explain the judgement behind it.
An absolute approach keeps the benchmark fixed. If two people deliver the same result, they may be placed similarly even if the journey there looked different.
A contextualised approach allows the same output to be read differently when complexity, disruption, or operating conditions were significantly different.
This is an organisational decision, not something each person should improvise in the meeting. If your trust has chosen a more absolute or more contextualised approach to performance, make sure you understand that before the conversation starts.
The wider workflow is designed to reduce friction around the conversation rather than add more admin around it.
Some trusts want markers placed beforehand and revealed in the meeting. Others prefer all placement to happen live in the conversation. The workflow supports either model.
The same meeting can cover up to two roles for one person, each with its own set of markers. This is useful when one person is carrying more than one substantial responsibility.
A meeting can also involve up to two appraisers. They can work jointly or separately, depending on what makes most sense for the role mix and the line-management structure.
The same meeting can run remotely, on multiple devices in the room, or in single-device mode. Marker movement and notes update live for everyone involved.
Markers can be dragged after the first placement, reset individually, and compared with previous meetings so the conversation is about progress rather than memory.
Notes can be added before, during, and after the meeting. They roll forward into later meetings while keeping the earlier record intact, and they can be downloaded when needed.
The same platform can support appraisal meetings, one-to-ones, induction, or probationary conversations. Notes from one meeting type can feed into another, and marker placement can be turned on only where it is genuinely useful.
Trusts can capture up to three extra dimensions through configurable sliders. The labels, ranges, and visibility can all be tailored, so only switch them on when they add signal rather than clutter.
The meeting only pays off if it changes what happens next.
Take a few minutes while the conversation is still fresh. What changed your thinking, and what stayed unresolved?
A useful review ends with a manageable action, not a vague ambition. Decide what happens next and by when.
If you want more structure afterwards, the reference section gives you light-touch models for reflection, planning, and listening.
If you want help reflecting on the conversation afterwards, the reference section gives you short, practical models for listening, reflection, and planning.
Open reference